CDAY:CA:TSX-Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

EQUITY | Application Software | Toronto Stock Exchange

Last Closing

CAD 70.13

Change

+1.89 (+2.77)%

Market Cap

CAD 9.88B

Volume

746.00

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

N/A

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2019-06-18 )

Largest Industry Peers for Application Software

ETFs Containing CDAY:CA

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Application Software) Market Performance vs. Exchange (Toronto Stock Exchange)
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 49.05% 91% A- 97% N/A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Total Return 49.05% 91% A- 96% N/A
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 34.61% 95% A 96% N/A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Total Return 34.61% 95% A 96% N/A
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 6.15% 50% F 76% C+
Dividend Return 6.15% 40% F 68% D+
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 17.17% 70% C- 44% F
Risk Adjusted Return 35.81% 45% F 52% F
Market Capitalization 9.88B 83% B 97% N/A

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification (Application Software) Ratio vs. Market (Toronto Stock Exchange)
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio -85.52 90% 97%
Price/Book Ratio 4.67 50% 9%
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 175.33 10% 0%
Price/Free Cash Flow Ratio 1,753.25 5% 0%
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity -4.49% 36% 26%
Return on Invested Capital 2.23% 45% 33%
Return on Assets -1.05% 45% 32%
Debt to Equity Ratio 65.00% 31% 43%

Annual Financials (CAD)

Quarterly Financials (CAD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Poor risk adjusted returns

This company is delivering below median risk adjusted returns in its peers. Even if it is outperforming on returns , the returns are unpredictable. Proceed with caution.

Highly leveraged

The company is in the bottom half compared to its sector peers on debt to equity and is highly leveraged. However, do check the news and look at its sector and management statements. Sometimes this is high because the company is trying to grow aggressively.

Poor capital utilization

The company management has delivered below median return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters compared to its peers.

Overpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Overpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading high compared to its peers median on a price to book value basis.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Negative earnings

The company had negative total earnings in the most recent four quarters.

Overpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector