PK:NYE-Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.

EQUITY | REITs | New York Stock Exchange

Last Closing

USD 28.62

Change

+0.26 (+0.92)%

Market Cap

USD 5.19B

Volume

1.28M

Analyst Target

USD 32.82
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc is a lodging real estate company. It portfolio consists of approximately 67 premium-branded hotels and resorts with over 35,000 rooms located in prime United States and internationally.

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2019-06-18 )

Largest Industry Peers for REITs

ETFs Containing PK

GRI GRI Bio Inc. 0.00 % 0.55 %

-0.01 (-0.87%)

USD 0.75M
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US Hig.. 0.00 % 0.70 %

+0.09 (+-0.87%)

USD 0.07B
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs E.. 0.00 % 0.00 %

-0.17 (-0.87%)

USD 0.01B
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF 0.00 % 0.00 %

-0.25 (-0.87%)

USD 4.06M

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (REITs) Market Performance vs. Exchange (New York Stock Exchange)
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 10.16% 38% F 48% F
Dividend Return 1.73% 25% F 54% F
Total Return 11.89% 34% F 49% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain -7.29% 18% F 36% F
Dividend Return 7.48% 72% C 87% B+
Total Return 0.19% 19% F 46% F
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A F
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 5.16% 80% B- 69% C-
Dividend Return 10.46% 80% B- 78% C+
Total Return 5.30% 60% D- 79% B-
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 11.78% 47% F 60% D-
Risk Adjusted Return 88.73% 71% C- 82% B
Market Capitalization 5.19B 85% B 81% B-

Key Financial Ratios

  Ratio vs. Industry/Classification (REITs) Ratio vs. Market (New York Stock Exchange)
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
Market Value  
Price / Earning Ratio 40.30 64% 51%
Price/Book Ratio 1.00 78% 65%
Price / Cash Flow Ratio 3.22 51% 39%
Price/Free Cash Flow Ratio 22.36 25% 25%
Management Effectiveness  
Return on Equity 8.22% 61% 53%
Return on Invested Capital 4.68% 64% 30%
Return on Assets 5.03% 81% 70%
Debt to Equity Ratio 51.25% 82% 61%

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Low debt

The company is less leveraged than its peers ,, and is among the top quartile, which makes it more flexible. However, do check the news and look at its sector. Sometimes this is low because the company is not growing and has no growth potential.

Superior return on assets

The company management has delivered better return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Underpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to book value basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
High volatility

The total returns for this company are volatile and above median for its sector over the past 5 years. Make sure you have the risk tolerance for investing in such stock.

Overpriced on free cash flow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to free cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector